Myanmar: A Rich Country with People on the Verge of Policy-induced Starvation

The Rohingya Muslims are Myanmar's most malnourished. It is policy-induced systematic deprivation - a slow genocide. 

"The term ‘slow genocide’ is an appropriate fit here because you deny people health care and nutritional opportunities. You deny people opportunities to work and earn an income and make a living to feed themselves and their family members. You deny people having medical care and expel the only organization (s) providing health care like Medicine San Frontiers, and don't allow them to return. That is killing people. And in that sense it is a genocide. It is a slow genocide. It's not like Rwanda. It's not like Khmer Rouge's Cambodia. It's not even like what exactly happened in Nazi Germany.... It is institutionalized killing." 

- Professor Amartya Sen, the world's foremost authority on famines and Nobel Prize winner in economics, The Conference on the Rohingya, Harvard University, 4 Nov 2014. 

Watch him here:


Watch live streaming video from webshare at livestream.com

From the Reuters' story:

"The worst malnutrition in Myanmar is in the border with Bangladesh in the northern part of Rakhine State. The average stunting rate for under-5 children in Myanmar is about 34 percent, meaning one in every three children under five years is too short for his age. On the border with Bangladesh that is over 50 percent. (Editor's note: Northern Rakhine State's Maungdaw and Buthidaung townships are home to the roughly 1 million-strong stateless Rohingya Muslim minority.)" 


A family cooks their lunch near a tree house, in Kan Gyi village, Shwe Taung Yan township in Ayeyarwady region in Myanmar, January 19, 2016. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun

YANGON, Jan 29 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - The United Nations' its needs until the end of 2016. The organisation provided food and cash assistance to 1.2 million people in 2015, including victims 

Dom Scalpelli, WFP country director in Myanmar, spoke to Myanmar Now, an independent news agency supported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation, about what the shortfall means and why Myanmar is still food insecure. 

Q: How concerned are you about the funding shortfall? Or is this part of a long-standing problem? 

A: The funding shortfalls are a common part of our business, unfortunately. It's like running a fire department without having the money for the trucks or the petrol in the trucks. Imagine, each time there's a fire, you need to quickly run around the city and ask for money. 

This is a bit like what happens when a flood happens in Myanmar or conflicts displaced people in Shan State. If it's a new emergency we typically have to run after new money. It's a constant challenge. 

Q: What would the shortfall mean in terms of humanitarian assistance? 

A: We have enough food for the internally displaced people (IDPs) to support them fully until April. (After that) we start to run into some problems. 

When there is a funding shortfall, we have to prioritise life-saving activities. This means nutritional support to malnourished babies and children under 5 years old, and pregnant and nursing mothers, assistance to the internally displaced people, especially those that are confined to camps in Kachin, Rakhine and Shan states, and the flood- and landslide-affected people. 

Things like the daily school meals programme - nutritious snacks to about 230,000 children in primary and pre-schools in very food insecure areas to encourage parents to keep sending their children to school - have to be put as a second priority. Same for other development programmes like rehabilitating community infrastructure like dams, fish ponds, roads and bridges, although it helps to prevent or mitigate future shocks and builds resilience. 

Q: Myanmar is a food surplus country, and yet a lot of communities, especially in ethnic areas, are food insecure, leading to malnourished people and children. Why is that? 

A: It's true that Myanmar is a rice surplus country and rice is often equated with food. But rice is not in and of itself nutritious in the way it is eaten here. Not many people eat brown rice. It has to be as white as white, and that means all the nourishment is 

Food insecurity is common among disadvantaged populations, like the landless, smallholders and minority ethnic groups, due to limited or inequitable access to land and resources, poor agriculture conditions and low resilience. Most farmers only have access to very small areas of land. This limits their ability to cultivate sufficient amount of staple food or vegetables for their household needs during the whole year. 

Q: What are some of the most food-insecure places in Myanmar and why? 

A: Border areas and the central dry zone are the most food insecure areas in Myanmar. In Chin, it is remoteness and isolation, and lack of job opportunities and arable land. In Rakhine it is movement restriction and lack of access to job opportunities and land, for all communities in Rakhine. For the central dry zone, it's poor soil and agriculture techniques. 

Q: How bad is malnutrition in Myanmar? 

A: Myanmar is still the third-most malnourished country in Southeast Asia after Timor-Leste and Cambodia. There's no reason for it. It’s a country that's rich in resources. It's just access to these resources, education and behavioural issues, and sometimes cultural practices that need to change to promote better nutrition. 

The worst malnutrition in Myanmar is in the border with Bangladesh in the northern part of Rakhine State. The average stunting rate for under-5 children in Myanmar is about 34 percent, meaning one in every three children under five years is too short for his age. On the border with Bangladesh that is over 50 percent. (Editor's note: Northern Rakhine State's Maungdaw and Buthidaung townships are home to the roughly 1 million-strong stateless Rohingya Muslim minority.) 

There were many short people in Japan after the war but now if you go to Tokyo there are lots of tall people. It really only takes a generation to break this cycle. 

Q: Malnutrition can have permanent impacts too, right? 

A: Yes. If a malnourished girl - someone in a food-insecure area here in Myanmar - typically gives birth at too early an age, chances are the child will be malnourished with some sort of deficiency, physical or mental. 

If the baby doesn't have enough nutrition for the first 1,000 days then the brain will not develop properly. Think about multiplying that across the whole population. There are studies in countries where the economic loss can be, on average, 11 percent of the GDP just because its babies are malnourished. That cycle can be broken. If, while she's pregnant, she starts to consume adequate, nutritious food and good, clean water etc, and continues to breastfeed exclusively after birth and gives nutritious food afterwards, the child can grow up healthily. And the longer a girl stays in school the more likely she'll give birth at a later age, meaning healthier babies, and the more likely she'll space her babies. 

Q: What can be done to address the problem? What should the new government do? 

A: We've just started with the government of Myanmar and a few other organisations to produce fortified foods. We want to try and put (that) on to the market and for us to be able to purchase it for our nutrition programmes. I understand Myanmar is the largest per capita rice consumer in the world, with more than 200 kilograms per person per year. If people are consuming that much of a certain food and it's fortified, that would go a long way to helping. 

Myanmar government launched the Zero Hunger Challenge in late 2014. It’s a first step. It's a global initiative and there’s a draft action plan on nutrition and food security, with clear responsibilities so that by 2025 there won’t be any stunted children in Myanmar.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.